Federal Court dismisses claims that RCMP pension plan discriminatory
The Federal Court has dismissed claims from three retired female Mounties who argued that elements of the RCMP’s pension plan are outdated and sexist.
Joanne Fraser, Allison Pilgrim and Colleen Fox decided to work part-time temporarily for the national police force after having children, in order to accommodate child-care arrangements while doing shift work.
When they returned to their full-time jobs they learned their part-time work was not considered pensionable service and they would not be permitted to make doubled-up contributions to buy back the time they had not worked.
On Thursday, Justice Catherine Kane decided the women did not lose pension benefits because they were women or parents, but because they chose to work part-time.
“They worked part-time in a job-sharing arrangement to meet the competing demands of their child-care responsibilities and their career,” Kane wrote.
The judge agreed that while the majority of Mounties who work part-time are women with young children, she said they also benefited from spending more time with their children and less stress in trying to find child care.
As for the overall impact on their pensions, Kane found it would be reduced, on average, by five per cent but that “it is difficult to conclude that the impact is necessarily adverse.”
It is likely that Thursday’s ruling will be a great relief to the federal government. If the Federal Court had changed the RCMP pension plan to allow people to accrue pensionable service while job sharing or working part-time, the government would likely have had to do it for all other public servants.
Article source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-pension-young-mothers-federal-court-1.4151519?cmp=rss