Facebook finally spells out what kinds of posts it bans

Facebook has suggested for a initial time usually what, exactly, is criminialized on a use in a new Community Standards document expelled on Tuesday. It’s an updated chronicle of a inner manners a association has used to establish what’s authorised and what isn’t, down to granular sum such as what, exactly, depends as a “credible threat” of violence. The prior public-facing chronicle gave a broad-strokes outline of a rules, yet a specifics were hidden in privacy for many of Facebook’s 2.2 billion users.

Not anymore. Here are usually some examples of what a manners ban. Note: Facebook has not altered a tangible manners — it has usually done them public.

Credible violence

Is there a real-world threat? Facebook looks for “credible statements of vigilant to dedicate assault opposite any person, groups of people, or place (city or smaller).” Is there a annuity or approach for payment? The discuss or an picture of a specific weapon? A aim and during slightest dual sum such as location, process or timing? A matter to dedicate assault opposite a exposed chairman or organisation such as “heads-of-state, witnesses and trusted informants, activists, and journalists” depends here too.

Also banned: instructions on “on how to make or use weapons if a idea is to harm or kill people,” unless there is “clear context that a calm is for an choice purpose (for example, common as partial of recreational self-defence activities, training by a country’s military, blurb video games, or news coverage).”

Hate speech

“We conclude hatred debate as a approach conflict on people formed on what we call stable characteristics — race, ethnicity, inhabitant origin, eremite affiliation, passionate orientation, sex, gender, gender identity, and critical incapacity or disease. We also yield some protections for immigration status,” Facebook says. As to what depends as a approach attack, a association says it’s any “violent or dehumanizing speech, statements of inferiority, or calls for ostracism or segregation.”

The prior public-facing chronicle of Facebook’s village standards gave a broad-strokes outline of a rules, yet a specifics were hidden in privacy for many of Facebook’s 2.2 billion users. (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)

There are 3 tiers of severity, trimming from comparing a stable organisation to pollution or illness to calls to “exclude or segregate” a chairman a organisation formed on a stable characteristics. Facebook does note that it does “allow critique of immigration policies and arguments for restricting those policies.”

Graphic violence

Images of assault opposite “real people or animals” with comments or captions that enclose delight of suffering, chagrin and remarks that pronounce definitely of a assault or “indicating a print is pity footage for marvellous observation pleasure” are prohibited. The captions and context matter in this box since Facebook does concede such images in some cases where they are condemned, or common as news or in a medical setting. Even then, though, a post contingency be singular so usually adults can see them and Facebook adds a warnings shade to a post.

Child passionate exploitation

“We do not concede calm that intimately exploits or endangers children. When we turn wakeful of apparent child exploitation, we news it to a National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), in correspondence with germane law. We know that infrequently people share bare images of their possess children with good intentions; however, we generally mislay these images since of a intensity for abuse by others and to assistance equivocate a probability of other people reusing or misappropriating a images,” Facebook says.

Then, it lists during slightest 12 specific instances of children in a passionate context, observant a anathema includes, yet is not singular to these examples. This includes “uncovered womanlike boobs for children comparison than toddler-age.”

Adult nakedness and passionate activity

“We know that nakedness can be common for a accumulation of reasons, including as a form of protest, to lift recognition about a cause, or for educational or medical reasons. Where such vigilant is clear, we make allowances for a content. For example, while we shorten some images of womanlike breasts that embody a nipple, we concede other images, including those depicting acts of protest, women actively intent in breast-feeding, and photos of post-mastectomy scarring,” Facebook says.

Facebook says while it restricts some images of womanlike breasts that embody a nipple, it allows other images, including women actively intent in breast-feeding. (Tina Spenst/Facebook)

That said, a association says it “defaults” to stealing passionate imagery to forestall a pity of non-consensual or underage content. The restrictions request to images of genuine people as good as digitally combined content, nonetheless art — such as drawings, paintings or sculptures — is an exception.

Article source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/facebook-community-standards-ban-1.4634384?cmp=rss