Subway stands behind a chicken.
The sandwich sequence is encountering a commentary of a CBC Marketplace investigation into quick food chicken. While many of a samples were found to enclose tighten to 100 per cent chicken DNA, Subway sandwiches contained almost reduction than a other chains. Tests showed an normal of 53.6 per cent duck DNA for a oven-roasted chicken and 42.8 per cent for a duck strips.
The story has garnered worldwide attention, and lifted questions about how most duck should be in a duck sandwich.
Subway says a news was “absolutely fake and misleading,” and demanded it be retracted. The Associated Press reported Tuesday that a sequence says a sandwiches enclose 100 per cent white beef with seasonings, nonetheless a part list it supposing to CBC News lists soy protein as a member of a company’s chicken.

Subway’s oven-roasted duck sandwich patty contains about 50 per cent duck DNA, according to lab tests. (CBC)
Marketplace stands by a news and is releasing a Subway exam formula as good as additional fact about a methodology and investigation.
The contrast of duck from McDonalds, Wendy’s, AW, Subway and Tim Hortons was conducted during a DNA lab during Trent University in Peterborough, Ont.
Marketplace initially tested 3 samples from Subway: dual from a oven-roasted duck and one from a duck strips. Each square of duck was damaged down into 3 smaller samples, that were away tested. The lab also retested these samples a second time.
Since a formula were so considerably opposite than a DNA combination of a other sandwiches, a lab tested 10 new samples, 5 of a oven-roasted duck and 5 of a duck strips. The samples were performed from mixed locations opposite Southern Ontario.
The steady tests all reinforced a lab’s initial assessment. The formula reported by CBC were a total normal of a formula of all 3 tests.
The lab also tested a samples from all bondage for plant DNA, and found that about half a DNA in a duck samples from Subway were of plant origin, a infancy of that was soy.
Only a Subway samples had poignant levels of plant DNA.
A note about a exam results: This was a information about a DNA lab contrast that was supposing to Subway on Feb. 16, 2017. The initial collection of Subway samples was retested, and those numbers are reflected in a final percentages.
While many media outlets took a formula to meant that a duck is usually half chicken, a existence of DNA contrast is somewhat some-more nuanced.
DNA tests don’t exhibit an accurate commission of a volume of duck in a whole piece, though DNA experts have told Marketplace that a contrast is a good indicator of a suit of animal and plant DNA in a product.
Trent University’s Wildlife Forensic DNA Laboratory stands by a exam results.
Robert Hanner, a biologist and associate executive for a Canadian Barcode of Life Network during a University of Guelph, Ont., pronounced DNA formula “cannot be taken as accurate mass ratios in a product,” though he adds they are a good indicator of how most soy is in Subway’s chicken.
Benjamin Bohrer, a food scientist during a University of Guelph and beef estimate expert, in a blog post published Monday, called for larger clarity from quick food companies so a open knows what they’re eating.
“DNA tests do not distortion (especially when conducted mixed times), and anyone with entrance to a DNA laboratory could perform these tests,” he wrote.
“Either make your duck truly a marinated, seasoned duck OR welcome your products for what they are and tell your business about your agenda. Consumers wish to know a story of their food, so be transparent.”
Subway declined to pronounce with Marketplace on camera about a findings, and declined to uncover Marketplace where and how a duck is made.
The sequence did confirm, by email, a mixture in a chicken:
Marketplace also reviewed part lists for all of a other sandwiches tested, and nothing of them listed soy.
The Chicken Challenge22:33
Article source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/subway-defends-its-chicken-after-cbc-marketplace-report-1.4005268?cmp=rss