B.C. clergyman done ‘nonsensical’ conclusions to boot domestic assault claims, new news says

Yet another examination has unclosed concerns about a late Vancouver psychologist’s work in child control battles, including allegations he used “nonsensical” assumptions to boot a mother’s fears of attack by her ex.

The latest examine into Allan Posthuma wrapped adult final month, when a College of Psychologists of B.C.’s exploration cabinet released a news alleging once again he had disregarded mixed sections of a formula of conduct.

A Seattle clergyman hired by a college to examination Posthuma’s work in a high-conflict control brawl resolved he “over-reached his exam data” by dismissing a mother’s fears that her life was in risk from her son’s father, according to a censure examination report.

Dr. Marsha Hedrick wrote that Posthuma used a computerized celebrity exam to sequence out stalking or abuse by a woman’s ex, a finish that “is foolish and gives a coming of bias.”

The new news comes on a heels of another 5 investigations that unclosed countless ways Posthuma’s work allegedly fell short.

As CBC News has reported, those investigations all finished when Posthuma late during a finish of 2018 after a four-decade career that saw him seem as an consultant in hundreds of family law matters. 

Because he gave adult his registration, a college opted to cancel a designed disciplinary hearing, and there was never any decisive anticipating of wrongdoing.

After this latest examination unclosed uninformed allegations, a college has again opted to not to take serve movement opposite Posthuma. The new news says “the open seductiveness would not be served by progressing serve proceedings.”

The mom whose censure stirred a examination says she’s not confident with that response.

“There’s so many repairs that’s been done. we can usually suppose a other people that are influenced by his files, since my family’s been ripped apart,” she said.

CBC News is not fixing a mom in sequence to strengthen a remoteness of her child.

The latest news highlights concerns about how Posthuma dealt with accusations of domestic attack during a mother’s child-custody dispute, and how he interpreted a formula of psychological questionnaires.

Posthuma endorsed a boy’s father as a some-more suitable parent, notwithstanding a story of attack and problems with aggression. A decider concluded with Posthuma, tying a mother’s parenting time to twice a month for dual hours, underneath supervision.

The mother’s lawyer, Carrie Humchitt, told CBC a father once kick a mom so exceedingly that she by a pregnancy.

“It was a documented settlement of violence, that wasn’t unequivocally taken into consideration,” Humchitt said.

The mom told CBC she felt “devastation” when she review Posthuma’s assessment.

“[I thought], how do we strengthen my son, since his father’s behaviours were unequivocally unfortunate when we were together,” she said. 

The father has a rapist story that includes an attack charge, dealt with by assent bond in 2012. 

A psychiatrist who assessed a couple’s afterwards six-year-old son in 2015 pronounced a child told him that “dad is unequivocally meant to me” and “he hurts me and causes me to have bruises,” according to a minute created by a psychiatrist. 

The minute says a father had a confining sequence opposite him during a time since of an attack on his son, and that a child had witnessed his father physically abusing his mother.

Questionable use of exam results

According to a college’s report, Posthuma discharged a mother’s allegations of abuse formed on her formula on a celebrity exam called a MMPI-2-RF. The exam consists wholly of loyal or fake questions and is especially used to consider mental disorders. 

Making any conclusions about abuse “goes distant beyond” what a exam is dictated for, according to Hedrick, a Seattle clergyman who reviewed Posthuma’s work.

Hedrick also questioned because Posthuma used a formula from something called a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to interpretation that a father had some-more intensity “to learn some-more effective parenting skills.”

That exam is meant to consider cognitive reasoning and, according to Hedrick, there’s 0 investigate suggesting it can be used to contend anything about someone’s parenting.

Though Posthuma shielded his work in conversations with a college, a news says a college exploration cabinet common Hedrick’s concerns.

The allegations relate those in prior investigations, that have regularly questioned Posthuma’s interpretation of exam data.

Parents who’ve oral to CBC about their practice with Posthuma all pronounced they were astounded by how many of their time was spent responding mixed choice questions on a computer.

The mom who filed a many new censure pronounced a contrast finished her anxious.

“I was home-schooled,” she said. “I’d never finished any grave contrast before, so we was unequivocally frightened going into it.”

College registrar Andrea Kowaz told CBC she couldn’t criticism on a specific investigation. She has formerly pronounced that a open is mostly best served when a veteran willingly cancels his or her registration, rather than going by a extensive and capricious disciplinary process.

Posthuma and his counsel did not respond to requests for comment. He has formerly told CBC that he is confident with his record and looks brazen to spending some-more time with his family during retirement.

Article source: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/allan-posthuma-psychologist-domestic-violence-1.5352600?cmp=rss