The decision to block Trump’s access following the attack on the U.S. Capitol was praised by Trump critics and had the support of most Americans but was condemned by free speech advocates who warned it set a dangerous precedent.
The Oversight Board accepted the case, saying the suspension has driven “intense global interest.”
Trump’s accounts will remain frozen until the Oversight Board rules on whether to lift the suspension. The Oversight Board has 90 days to make a decision but a ruling is expected more quickly. Its decision is binding and cannot be overruled by CEO Mark Zuckerberg or any other Facebook executive.
Violence that erupted at Capitol was incited by pro-Trump mob on social media
GOP loses thousands of Twitter followers:Trump allies and Republican lawmakers lost thousands of followers in Twitter purge after Capitol riots
Nick Clegg, Facebook’s vice president of global affairs and communications, said the company believes its decision was “necessary and right.”
“Given its significance, we think it is important for the board to review it and reach an independent judgment on whether it should be upheld,” he said.
Facebook’s oversight board launched last year to tackle the toughest calls the company faces. It is supposed to function as an independent entity but gets financial backing from Facebook.
In September, some of the company’s critics launched a rival panel of independent experts to monitor Facebook. The company dismissed the effort as “mostly longtime critics creating a new channel for existing criticisms.”
tested the boundaries of what he could say, violating prohibitions against election misinformation, glorifying violence and falsehoods about COVID-19. But the decision to suspend Trump after the violent unrest in Washington brought growing discomfort with a handful of corporations having so much control over the nation’s online conversation.
CEO Jack Dorsey, whose platform permanently banned Trump, said later he thought Twitter made the right decision but worried about the repercussions.
“We faced an extraordinary and untenable circumstance, forcing us to focus all of our actions on public safety,” Dorsey wrote. “Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and enforcement above all.”