A lawyer for Kevin Spacey is accusing prosecutors of withholding information that could help the actor’s case. Attorney Alan Jackson accused prosecutors of falsely denying they had access to information about the accuser’s cellphone. (June 3)
NANTUCKET, Mass. â€” The criminal groping case against Kevin Spacey was back in court here on Monday for a pretrial hearing on a missing cellphone believed critical to both sides, which has not been foundÂ according to the lawyer for the accuser, who appeared in public for the first time in the case.
Spacey, facing a felony indecent assault charge, was not required to be there; his legal team, led by Los Angeles defense attorney Alan Jackson, was there.
Present at the hearing for the first time in public: Spacey’s accuser, William Little, 21, and his family, who were ordered by Judge Thomas Barrett to be there to talk about what happened to his cellphone, missing for months.
The accuser sat in the front row of a packed courthouse gallery, flanked by his father, Nick Little, and his mother, former Boston TV anchor Heather Unruh.
Taking the stand to answer questions, the accuserÂ denied he deleted anything from his phone, a key allegation made by the defense and the rationale for Spacey’s demand he be granted access to the actual phone.
Dressed in a blue blazer, pink shirt and khaki pants, his face slightly red perhaps from a sunburn, the accuser said he texted with his then-girlfriend and to a group of seven friends on the night of the alleged assault, July 7, 2016.Â
He acknowledged not reporting the alleged crime until a year and three months after the incident. He said he could not recall how many times he talked about the assault with his mother during that period, but said it would have been likely more than five.Â
â€œIâ€™m really not sure,â€ he said.Â â€œLike I said earlier, it was a long time ago.â€Â He was composed throughout his testimony.
When he was asked by Jackson whether he â€œin any wayâ€ altered any of the text messages about the alleged assault prior to informing law enforcement about it, the accuser responded, “I provided what I had available to meâ€ at the time.
HeÂ said a â€œhalf a screen shotâ€ is missing from the screenshot texts from the phone but that he did not delete anything.Â
Jackson said, â€œText messages donâ€™t just disappear from a phone.â€
The accuser responded: â€œUnless there was some kind of error with the phone.â€ He added,Â â€œI have no knowledge of any deletions on my phone.â€
Jackson asked him whether heâ€™s aware that destroying evidence is a felony under Massachusetts law.
â€œI am now,â€ the accuser said.
Mitchell Garabedian, the accuserâ€™s attorney, told the judge the cellphone has still not been located but that his team collected data from the accuserâ€™s MacBook computer which has information from his phone on a thumb drive.
â€œYour honor, we could not locate the phone,â€ he said. â€œMy clients do not recall ever receiving the phone.
“Are there any deletions on it? I donâ€™t know,â€ Garabedian said.Â
He saidÂ the defense is concerned about two videos, one of which he tracked down. He called that video â€œirrelevant to the case.â€Â
A prosecutor told the judge there was a report generated to the accuserâ€™s family and the data was handed to Spaceyâ€™s legal team in December. He said thereâ€™s no protocol for turning back evidence â€“ a point Spaceyâ€™s team rejected.Â
â€œOf course, thereâ€™s a protocol that should be in place,â€ Jackson said. “And if thereâ€™s not one, we end up with a disaster like this.”
“Guess who loses because of this?â€ Jackson said. â€œThat would be us because we are entitled to the phone.â€
â€œAt some point, the phone was turned back over to somebody,â€ Judge Barrett said.
Spacey faces a felony indecent assault charge that he groped Little, then an 18-year-old busboy in a bar on the Massachusetts resort island in July 2016.
The accuser’s cellphone, which he used to send texts and videos to his girlfriend and to friends during the alleged three-minute assault, could be used by either the prosecution as potential evidence bolstering the accuser’s story, or by the defense, which believes there are exculpatory texts on the phone that would exonerate him.
But the cellphone has somehow disappeared or been misplaced, and there is a dispute about who last had custody of it, the police or the accuser’s family.
According to court documents, the police say they gave the cellphone to the accuser’s father. GarabedianÂ saidÂ they don’t remember thatÂ and failed to find the phone after looking for it. He said the family was trying to find backup copies of its contents.
State Police Trooper Gerald Donovan, who beginning in November 2017 investigated the sexual assault allegations after it was reported by the family, said that whenÂ he wanted to access information from the cellphone, Unruh, the accuser’s mother, provided it as well as a password to access it.
Jackson hammered this point, saying that it means Unruh had access to do what she pleasedÂ with the phone before it was given to law enforcement.Â
â€œAnd she could delete things from the phone if she wanted,â€ Jackson said.
Donovan replied, â€œShe could do anything she wanted.â€
Donovan said the mother told him she deleted â€œfrat boy activitiesâ€ that were on the phone. Jackson asked why Donovan didnâ€™t tell the family to not delete any material from the phone.Â
â€œIn retrospect, do you think that would have been a wise decision?â€ Jackson said.Â
â€œSitting here now? Sure,â€ Donovan said.Â
Jackson asked Donovan if he thought Unruh would â€œfib a little bitâ€ about the contents of the phone.Â
â€œI didnâ€™t think Heather Unruh would be lying to me, so yes, I did take her by her word.â€
Jackson asked the accuser if his mother ever told him to “get rid of any (text messages)?â€
â€œI donâ€™t remember,â€Â he responded.Â
Jackson asked it in a different way â€“ whether he followed any instructions to delete any texts from his phone.
â€œHad she done that, I would have acted on my own free will, if thatâ€™s what youâ€™re asking,â€ the accuser said.
Barrett ordered the hearing, already delayed once due to the missing phone, to discuss what happens next in the case if the cellphone is not found.
If there is no cellphone, a trial of Spacey then becomes more of a he said-he said case, because there is no video surveillance tape from the bar showing what happened, nor any other witnesses who have come forward to say they saw Spacey grope the accuser.
The caseÂ hit headlines in November 2017 after UnruhÂ called a press conference in Boston with Garabedian to accuse Spacey of molesting her son on Nantucket.
It was more than a year after the encounter at the Nantucket bar but immediately afterÂ Spacey became one of the first Hollywood men to be caught up in the surge of #MeToo allegations by women and men against powerful entertainment figures.Â
So far, this is the only criminal case pending against Spacey, although he remains under investigation in Los Angeles and in London. In MayÂ British police interviewed Spacey in the U.S. about six claims of sexual assault and assault against the former â€œHouse of Cardsâ€ star, who ran Londonâ€™s Old Vic Theatre between 2004 and 2015.
After more than a year ofÂ inquiries by local and state police on Nantucket, Cape Islands District Attorney Michael O’Keefe announced that Spacey would be charged with one felony indecent assault charge. He was arraigned in January 2019.
Ever since, prosecutors and defense lawyers have been arguing at hearings and in court documents over discovery, leading to the current impasse over the cellphone matter.
Meanwhile, the accuser and his family first filed – and on Friday abruptly dropped – a civil suit against Spacey, seeking unspecified damagesÂ for â€œsevere and permanent mental distress and emotional injuriesâ€ arising from the alleged assault at issue in the criminal case.
Garabedian said in court documents the decision to drop the suit was “voluntary” and permanent. He did not explain why it was dropped just a week after it was filed.Â
A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.
Ellen DeGeneres, AP