Fact check: GOP responses to State of a Union
There were mixed central and unaccepted Republican responses to President Obama’s State of a Union Address, though usually a few instances of a president’s critics stretching a facts:
• Sen. Ted Cruz secretly claimed that “not a word was pronounced about radical Islamic terrorism.” In fact, Obama vowed to fight “violent extremism” and asked for congressional management to use force opposite a Islamic State.
• Cruz also pronounced Obama “could not move himself even to bring” adult a president’s executive movement on immigration. But he did. Obama pronounced he would halt legislation that try to remove it.
•
CRUZ: ‘WHAT we SAW’
Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst gave the central GOP response.
Two expected presidential possibilities — Cruz and Paul — gave some-more forceful speeches aggressive a president’s leadership.
Cruz gave what his aides called an “impromptu video responseposted on a senator’s Facebook pagethe initial aborted attempt
In his video, Cruz criticized Obama’s speech
Cruz claimed “not a word was pronounced about radical Islamic terrorism.” That’s false.
Cruz, Jan. 20
While it is loyal that Obama did not complete a word “radical Islamic terrorism,” a boss did use a word “violent extremism” and asked for congressional management to use force opposite a Islamic State, a radical Islamic militant organisation that a boss referred to in his debate as ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Levant).
Obama, Jan. 20
Now, this bid will take time. It will need focus. But we will succeed. And tonight, we call on this Congress to uncover a universe that we are joined in this goal by flitting a fortitude to sanction a use of force opposite ISIL. We need that authority.
Obama’s critics, including Cruzan talk early in his administrationHisham Melhem
Melhem, Jan. 26, 2009
Obama
Regardless of what denunciation he did or didn’t use, a boss directly addressed what Cruz calls “radical Islamic terrorism.”
On immigration, Cruz pronounced a boss “could not move himself even to bring” adult a executive movement that he took on immigration. The president’s actions, as we have written
Cruz, Jan. 20
But Obama did move it up. It’s only that Obama didn’t contend what Cruz would have liked. Obama pronounced he would halt any legislation that attempts to remove his actions on immigration, health caring and financial regulations.
Obama, Jan. 20
At a finish of his video response, Cruz said: “That’s what we saw tonight.” We don’t know what Cruz saw, though we can contend what Obama pronounced in his speech.
PAUL: ‘LIBERAL’ LIGHT BULBS
In his YouTube video response to Obama’s State of a Union, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul pronounced “liberal elites” wanted to umpire “what light bulbs we can use.” Actually, it was a 2007 appetite bill, sealed by President George W. Bush, that phased out normal illuminated bulbs, in preference of some-more appetite fit ones.
Congress upheld a Energy Independence and Security Actsigned it a following daydelayed coercion of a new potency standards
We explained in May 2011who support a 2007 standardsaren’t banned
While spending bills have continuedsaid
The Obama administration positively supports a appetite potency standards for light bulbs. Way behind in 2007, when he was on a debate trail, Obama pronounced he wanted to “phase out all illuminated light bulbs,” a guarantee a colleagues during Politifact have rated a “compromise”
In his 2012 response to a State of a Union, then-Indiana administrator Mitch Daniels made a identical dubious remarkwrongly claimedWashington Post
Article source: http://rssfeeds.usatoday.com/~/83841193/0/usatodaycomwashington-topstories~Fact-check-GOP-responses-to-State-of-the-Union/