Share

Canada produces the most waste in the world. The US ranks third

CLOSE

For a country known for its cleanliness, number one might surprise you.
USA TODAY

The world is drowning in trash, and the waste generation rates are only increasing, according to the World Bank. Due to population growth and urban areas growth, the amount of trash countries produce is only expected to rise – by some estimates as much as 70% between 2016 and 2050.

While much of the focus is on individuals and families and the amount of trash they generate, residential trash is only a fraction of the garbage produced by certain industries.

Municipal solid waste management (MSW), which is waste generated from companies, buildings, institutions, small businesses, houses, and yards, often comprises less than 5% of the total amount of waste produced in a country.

Between 30% and 35% of the total amount of generated waste in most developed countries is attributed to building sector activities such as building construction, renovation, and demolition processes, according to the official EU statistical data.

In many countries on our list, the construction industry is often the largest culprit, generating more than 90% of the total waste produced in a country. China is a notable exception, where more than half of the waste is agricultural or industrial.

Many countries have recognized the importance of properly and safely disposing of trash and have passed laws regulating how cities and corporations source and get rid of the waste they are producing. Some developing countries are struggling because governments often lack the funding to solve waste management challenges. Many are focusing on advocating recycling. In the United States, for example, some states will even pay you to recycle.

To identify the largest producers of waste, 24/7 Tempo calculated the special waste and regular municipal solid waste per capita produced by each country, using data from the World Bank’s “What a Waste” global database, last updated in September of 2018. We summed for each country the metric tons (or tonnes) of waste in the latest year for which data was available in the special categories of agricultural waste, construction and demolition, e waste, hazardous waste, industrial waste, medical waste, and the total municipal solid waste (msw).

A car for Nazis and hippies alike: Say goodbye to the Volkswagen Beetle

10. Serbia

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 8.9 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 62,269,603 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 0.8%

• Population: 7,020,858

Similar to other countries on the list, Serbia also generates a large amount of construction industry waste – over 46 million metric tons of the 62 million metric tons of total waste.

The residential construction industry in Serbia has been booming over the last several years. Permits are being issued in record numbers. The huge amount of construction and demolition waste may be partially explained by a law that requires 70% of construction material and built-in equipment to be made in Serbia. Regulation and individual initiatives to properly manage construction waste are both lacking. This has resulted in construction waste going directly to municipal landfills without sorting.

9. Ukraine

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 10.6 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 474,106,025 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 3.2%

• Population: 44,831,135

Ukraine, one of the biggest arms dealers in the world, generates just over 474 million metric tons of waste a year, 448 million of which is hazardous waste. No other of the 105 countries for which data on hazardous waste is available produces more such waste. The government has recognized hazardous waste management as the most urgent and critical issue that needs to be addressed in waste management in general. Lack of financing has been identified as a major reason for the lack of initiatives in the field.

Most of the other 26 million metric tons of waste in Ukraine is municipal solid waste and agricultural waste, which includes garbage produced in farms, poultry and slaughterhouses, harvest waste, fertilizer run-off from fields, and pesticides.

8. Luxembourg

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 11.8 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 7,016,503 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 28.4%

• Population: 596,336

Luxembourg, a tiny nation of about 600,000 people, produced slightly more than 7 million tonnes of waste in 2017, but only a fraction of it was municipal solid waste. This kind of waste consists of products homes, businesses, schools, and hospitals throw out, such as appliances, clothes, bottles, food, and paper.

The other 90.0% of the garbage was mostly construction and demolition waste. The construction industry in Luxembourg has fared better than many other EU countries since the recession because of its overall strong economy. The number of building companies, as well as building permits, increased between 2008 and 2013. Investment in construction grew by 8.6% after rebounding from the housing crisis. Part of the demand may be explained by the growing tourism industry. Luxembourg is among the most tourism-friendly countries in the world.

7. Sweden

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 16.2 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 163,199,471 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 32.4%

• Population: 10,057,698

Sweden, one of the happiest countries in the world, generates about 163 million tonnes of waste a year, the 15th most of the 178 countries for which data is available. But only a small fraction of that – about 2.6% – is municipal solid waste, while about 93% of the garbage is construction and demolition waste. The rest is mostly medical and hazardous waste.

Though Sweden is among the countries producing the most waste, largely due to the large amount of construction waste, the nation has made improvements in recycling this waste. This kind of waste has been prioritized in the national waste plan and in its waste prevention program.

6. Armenia

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 16.3 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 47,889,000 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: N/A

• Population: 2,930,450

Armenia produces relatively little municipal waste, with nearly 493,000 tons in 2014. It also ranks among the countries producing the least amount of agricultural and construction waste. However, what contributes to Armenia’s rank among the world’s biggest producers of waste is the huge amount of industrial waste it produces. Of the nearly 48 million tons of total waste the country produces, 47.3 million is industrial.

Armenia does not have processing plants or specialized sites to treat and bury waste, partly explaining its waste problem. Its first solid waste landfill has been in the making since 2011. The country’s garbage is currently being disposed of at uncontrolled dumpsites from which toxins escape into the air in the form of methane gas.

Tech heavyweights fight: Amazon, Microsoft wage war over $10 billion opportunity with the Pentagon

5. Finland

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 16.6 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 91,698,449 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 28.1%

• Population: 5,508,214

Just about 3.0% of the total waste produced in Finland is municipal waste. Almost half of it is burned, a trend that has only been improving over the last several years. Recycling has also been increasing because it’s a highly advocated method of waste management in the country and in Europe in general.

The other 97.0% of waste generated in the country comes from various industries, but mostly construction. The housing sector in Finland, one of the richest countries in the world, has been growing due to low mortgage rates and expanding urban areas, resulting in an increased demand for new buildings, especially with small apartments in centrally located zones.

4. Estonia

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 23.5 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 30,912,409 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 24.7%

• Population: 1,317,384

Estonia, a rising tourism destination where tourists sometimes outnumber locals, produces a total amount of nearly 31 million metric tons of garbage, and a third of that is hazardous waste. The country generates more than 35 times the EU average of hazardous waste per capita, with almost all of it coming from the oil shale sector. Ash and other waste from combusting and refining ends up in landfill, polluting the air with toxic substances.

The country has set regulations for discharging of hazardous waste with taxes imposed if such waste is dumped into water, but payment of these taxes is not strictly enforced, resulting in weak incentive for companies to reduce their environmental footprint, according to the OECD.

House hunting? The housing market is about to shift in a bad way for buyers

3. United States

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 25.9 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 8,425,840,000 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 34.6%

• Population: 325,147,121

The United States, with the third-largest population of all countries, produced the most municipal solid waste in the world – 258 million tonnes of MSW was generated in 2017. By contrast, second-place China generated 210 million tonnes of MSW in 2017. Adding to this total the World Bank’s special waste categories of industrial, medical, E waste, hazardous, and agricultural waste, the U.S. generates approximately 8.4 billion tonnes of waste in a year.

While the U.S. is the third biggest producer of waste on a per capita basis, some areas within the country are making strides addressing the problem. For example, San Francisco passed an ordinance in 2009 requiring all residents and tourists to compost food waste. The city turned more than a million tonnes of food waste into compost, and as of 2012 had achieved nearly 80% waste diversion – the highest rate of any major U.S. city in the United States. Local government are raising awareness about recycling. Some state now will even pay residents to recycle.

2. Bulgaria

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 26.7 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 189,141,945 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 19.0%

• Population: 7,075,947

Bulgaria, a country of about 7 million people, generates slightly more garbage per person as the United States, a country of more than 325 million people. This is largely due to the more than 172 million metric tons of waste produced by the construction industry, the fifth highest amount of the 68 countries for which construction and demolition waste data is available.

After an economic slowdown that resulted from the global recession, the construction business is picking up again. Real estate construction has seen the greatest increase in activity – 16.4% between 2010 and 2016. While Bulgaria seems on track to produce even more waste, it is among the countries doing the most to minimize its effect on the environment.

Uber Comfort: You can now request more legroom and less conversation in Uber rides

1. Canada

• Estimated annual waste per capita: 36.1 metric tons

• Estimated annual waste total: 1,325,480,289 metric tons

• Waste treatment recycling: 20.6%

• Population: 36,708,083

Driven by agricultural waste and industrial waste generation, which totaled 181 million tonnes and 1.12 billion tonnes, respectively, in 2017, Canada’s estimated total waste generation is the highest in the world. Canada produced 1.33 billion metric tonnes of waste, or 36.1 tonnes per person.

According to the Canadian government, waste from industrial activities such as oil refining, chemical manufacturing, and metal processing contains various hazardous chemicals, including acids, phenols, arsenic, lead, and mercury. Industrial waste generation is a long-standing problem in Canada, which sought to address the issue as early as 1992 when it ratified the Basel Convention. Like many affluent nations, Canada exports large portions of its waste to other countries, and the convention controls and aims at reducing these waste shipments. This and other measures put Canada on the list of countries doing the most to protect the environment.

24/7 Wall Street is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news and commentary. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

Post to Facebook

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

  • Using data from the Federal Highway Administration, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the share of bridges that are structurally deficient and the share of roadway that is unserviceable to identify the states that are falling apart.nbsp;nbsp;1 of 51
  • strong50. Nevada/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 1.3% (3rd lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 1.4% (2nd lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $281 (6th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.2 minutes (22nd lowest)2 of 51
  • strong49. Florida/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 1.3% (the lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 2.6% (6th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $457 (22nd lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 27.8 minutes (10th highest)3 of 51
  • strong48. Utah/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.4% (9th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 2.2% (4th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $399 (14th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 22.0 minutes (12th lowest)4 of 51
  • strong47. Arizona/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.1% (16th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 1.8% (3rd lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $239 (2nd lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 25.6 minutes (19th highest)5 of 51
  • strong46. Vermont/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.5% (19th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 2.4% (5th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $906 (6th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 23.2 minutes (15th lowest)6 of 51
  • strong45. Georgia/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.8% (12th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 3.3% (7th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $254 (3rd lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 28.8 minutes (7th highest)7 of 51
  • strong44. Alabama/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.1% (5th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 4.3% (9th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $405 (15th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.6 minutes (25th highest)8 of 51
  • strong43. Kansas/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 1.3% (2nd lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 5.2% (17th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $537 (21st highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 19.1 minutes (6th lowest)9 of 51
  • strong42. Texas/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 5.5% (23rd highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 1.3% (the lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $509 (23rd highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 26.5 minutes (14th highest)10 of 51
  • strong41. Tennessee/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.4% (10th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 4.3% (10th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $270 (5th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 25.1 minutes (21st highest)11 of 51
  • strong40. Virginia/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.7% (11th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 4.6% (13th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $541 (20th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 28.6 minutes (8th highest)12 of 51
  • strong39. Delaware/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.9% (21st lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 3.9% (8th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $671 (13th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 26.5 minutes (14th highest)13 of 51
  • strong38. Oregon/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.1% (15th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 5.2% (16th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $318 (10th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.3 minutes (24th lowest)14 of 51
  • strong37. New Mexico/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.0% (14th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 5.8% (20th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $662 (14th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 22.3 minutes (14th lowest)15 of 51
  • strong36. Minnesota/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 4.1% (22nd lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 5.0% (14th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $555 (18th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 23.8 minutes (20th lowest)16 of 51
  • strong35. Kentucky/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.3% (8th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 7.1% (25th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $825 (8th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 23.3 minutes (16th lowest)17 of 51
  • strong34. Indiana/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.4% (18th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 6.2% (21st lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $383 (12th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 23.6 minutes (18th lowest)18 of 51
  • strong33. Idaho/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.8% (13th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 7.0% (23rd lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $500 (24th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 21.0 minutes (9th lowest)19 of 51
  • strong32. Wyoming/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 1.9% (4th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 8.2% (21st highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $1,241 (3rd highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 17.6 minutes (3rd lowest)20 of 51
  • strong31. Arkansas/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 6.3% (18th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 4.6% (11th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $495 (25th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 21.6 minutes (10th lowest)21 of 51
  • strong30. Missouri/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.2% (6th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 8.6% (18th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $314 (9th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 23.7 minutes (19th lowest)22 of 51
  • strong29. Montana/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.5% (20th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 7.4% (23rd highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $934 (4th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 18.1 minutes (4th lowest)23 of 51
  • strong28. Colorado/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 5.9% (21st highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 5.4% (18th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $305 (7th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 25.9 minutes (18th highest)24 of 51
  • strong27. Ohio/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 5.8% (22nd highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 5.6% (19th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $415 (17th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 23.6 minutes (18th lowest)25 of 51
  • strong26. South Carolina/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 4.4% (23rd lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 8.5% (20th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $313 (8th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.6 minutes (25th highest)26 of 51
  • strong25. North Dakota/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 2.2% (7th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 10.8% (9th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $1,743 (2nd highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 16.5 minutes (the lowest)27 of 51
  • strong24. Connecticut/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 6.2% (19th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 7.2% (25th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $446 (19th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 26.4 minutes (16th highest)28 of 51
  • strong23. North Carolina/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 3.3% (17th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 10.2% (11th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $480 (24th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.9 minutes (23rd highest)29 of 51
  • strong22. New Hampshire/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 4.8% (25th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 9.0% (16th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $422 (18th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 27.3 minutes (11th highest)30 of 51
  • strong21. Maryland/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 9.2% (10th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 5.1% (15th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $548 (19th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 33.3 minutes (2nd highest)31 of 51
  • strong20. Washington/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 10.7% (9th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 4.6% (12th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $385 (13th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 27.9 minutes (9th highest)32 of 51
  • strong19. Nebraska/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 6.4% (17th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 8.8% (17th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $561 (17th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 18.5 minutes (5th lowest)33 of 51
  • strong18. Illinois/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 6.9% (16th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 8.5% (19th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $723 (10th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 29.1 minutes (6th highest)34 of 51
  • strong17. Mississippi/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 6.0% (20th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 9.4% (14th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $468 (23rd lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.9 minutes (23rd highest)35 of 51
  • strong16. Oklahoma/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 5.3% (24th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 11.0% (8th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $689 (11th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 21.9 minutes (11th lowest)36 of 51
  • strong15. Wisconsin/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 11.1% (8th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 7.4% (24th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $449 (20th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 22.2 minutes (13th lowest)37 of 51
  • strong14. Michigan/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 7.6% (12th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 10.7% (10th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $172 (the lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.3 minutes (24th lowest)38 of 51
  • strong13. Maine/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 7.3% (14th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 13.1% (6th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $610 (15th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 24.0 minutes (21st lowest)39 of 51
  • strong12. South Dakota/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 4.6% (24th lowest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 16.7% (4th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $878 (7th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 17.3 minutes (2nd lowest)40 of 51
  • strong11. Louisiana/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 9.1% (11th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 13.0% (7th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $450 (21st lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 25.3 minutes (20th highest)41 of 51
  • strong10. Hawaii/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 16.1% (5th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 6.9% (22nd lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $590 (16th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 27.0 minutes (13th highest)42 of 51
  • strong9. New York/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 13.4% (7th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 10.0% (12th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $366 (11th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 33.7 minutes (the highest)43 of 51
  • strong8. California/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 16.9% (3rd highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 7.0% (24th lowest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $269 (4th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 29.8 minutes (4th highest)44 of 51
  • strong7. Pennsylvania/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 7.1% (15th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 16.6% (5th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $773 (9th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 27.1 minutes (12th highest)45 of 51
  • strong6. Massachusetts/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 15.4% (6th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 9.2% (15th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $495 (25th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 29.8 minutes (4th highest)46 of 51
  • strong5. New Jersey/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 16.8% (4th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 8.1% (22nd highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $516 (22nd highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 32.1 minutes (3rd highest)47 of 51
  • strong4. West Virginia/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 4.8% (25th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 19.9% (2nd highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $910 (5th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 26.0 minutes (17th highest)48 of 51
  • strong3. Iowa/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 7.5% (13th highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 19.4% (3rd highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $684 (12th highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 19.4 minutes (7th lowest)49 of 51
  • strong2. Alaska/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 18.7% (2nd highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 9.7% (13th highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $2,374 (the highest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 19.6 minutes (8th lowest)50 of 51
  • strong1. Rhode Island/strongbr /strongbull; Roads in poor condition:/strong 24.6% (the highest)br /strongbull; Structurally deficient bridges:/strong 23.1% (the highest)br /strongbull; State highway spending per driver:/strong $408 (16th lowest)br /strongbull; Avg. travel time to work:/strong 25.1 minutes (21st highest)51 of 51

Article source: http://rssfeeds.usatoday.com/~/604368438/0/usatodaycomworld-topstories~Canada-produces-the-most-waste-in-the-world-The-US-ranks-third/

Loading...

Best Wordpress Plugin development company in India     Best Web development company in India