Court issues claim opposite pointless drug tests for Suncor employees
An Edmonton decider has systematic oilsands hulk Suncor not to ensue with skeleton to start pointless drug tests of a employees.
The kinship representing 3,000 of a company’s workers, Unifor 707A, practical on Nov. 30 for an claim to hindrance a testing.
Unifor’s lawyer, John Carpenter, argued that pointless drug and ethanol tests violate privacy, grace and corporeal integrity.
In his statute Thursday, Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Paul Belzil agreed.
Belzil released an halt claim to forestall pointless drug and ethanol tests until an interest stemming from an settlement between a kinship and Suncor can be decided.
Ken Smith, boss of Unifor 707 A, pronounced he’s gratified with Thursday’s decision.
“We unequivocally do trust … it was an transgression on workers’ rights,” he said.
Years of justice battles
The conflict over pointless tests between started in 2012, when Unifor filed a protest with a work settlement panel.
The three-member row authorised a protest in a 2014 decision.
Suncor successfully appealed that preference and a new settlement was ordered.
The kinship mislaid a interest of that preference before a Alberta Court of Appeal on Sept. 28, 2017.
Unifor is now seeking leave to interest to a Supreme Court of Canada.
In Thursday’s decision, Belzil pronounced a parties determine a Suncor site is dangerous though “agree on probably zero else.”
He pronounced he was presented with opposing justification on either pointless tests make a workplace safer.
He also pronounced there was estimable feud between a parties on either drug use during a work site is increasing.
Privacy as critical as safety
Belzil wrote that a Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled that remoteness rights of workers are as critical as reserve concerns.
Employees who have no drug or ethanol problems and who have not been concerned in workplace incidents would be impacted by pointless tests, he wrote.
Belzil found that employees would humour lost harm if pointless drug and ethanol tests are allowed to occur before a final preference is reached on a settlement ruling.
Article source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/suncor-unifor-707a-union-drug-tests-arbitration-panel-1.4437905?cmp=rss