{"id":195671,"date":"2019-12-05T06:30:00","date_gmt":"2019-12-05T06:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2019-12-05T06:30:00","modified_gmt":"2019-12-05T06:30:00","slug":"could-house-impeachment-proceedings-drag-on-into-2020-the-timings-unclear","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/political\/could-house-impeachment-proceedings-drag-on-into-2020-the-timings-unclear.html","title":{"rendered":"Could House impeachment proceedings drag on into 2020? The timing&#8217;s unclear"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/video.foxnews.com\/v\/6113044976001\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wordpressdynamos.com\/timesofnewscdn\/USA\/15c77_694940094001_6113047348001_6113044976001-vs.jpg\" alt=\"Constitutional experts clash in House Judiciary Committee hearing on impeachment\" \/><span class=\"overlay\">Video<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<h4 class=\"title\"><a href=\"http:\/\/video.foxnews.com\/v\/6113044976001\">Constitutional experts clash in House Judiciary Committee hearing on impeachment<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>Professor Jonathan Turley rebuts bribery, obstruction claims against President Trump; reaction and analysis from the &#8216;Special Report&#8217; All-Star panel.<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\"><span class=\"dateline\">CAPITOL HILL \u2013 <\/span>Is there enough time for lawmakers\u00a0to deposit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/category\/politics\/trump-impeachment-inquiry\">articles of impeachment<\/a> on the House floor this calendar year? Or, could this wait? Finally, do <a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/category\/politics\/house-of-representatives\/democrats\">Democrats<\/a> have the votes to impeach?<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">If a House impeachment vote drifts into 2020, analysts likely will crow that it would be extraordinary for the House to attempt to impeach President Trump in \u201can election year.\u201d But, it\u2019s tough to calibrate the political advantages or disadvantages of doing impeachment in December or when the calendar flips.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s doubtful that in the future, the public would recall precisely when the House voted to impeach. Republicans would assert that Democrats were so brazen that they \u201cimpeached the president in an election year.\u201d Putting impeachment on the floor in, say, October, just before a November general election, may be a real no-no. However, nobody on the Hill has suggested that scenario would be in play.<\/p>\n<p>Heretofore, few actions on impeachment by either side have altered the public\u2019s perception of impeachment. So, if the \u201cneedle\u201d never moves, then it might not matter when the House considers articles of impeachment on the floor.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats may prefer to complete the impeachment process expeditiously and push it to the Senate.<\/p>\n<p>House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif.,\u00a0presented his panel\u2019s impeachment report to the caucus of Democrats on Wednesday morning \u2013 receiving a standing ovation. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., asked rank-and-file Democrats to give one another time and space to reach their own conclusions about impeachment. Democrats who spoke in the meeting indicated they wanted the inquiry to continue on what was described as a \u201cdeliberate path.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/video.foxnews.com\/v\/6113048876001\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wordpressdynamos.com\/timesofnewscdn\/USA\/d1d49_694940094001_6113049095001_6113048876001-vs.jpg\" alt=\"Doug Collins spars with Jerry Nadler after Louie Gohmert tries to speak\" \/><span class=\"overlay\">Video<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Intelligence Committee concluded its probe this week. During Wednesday\u2019s inaugural Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing, Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y.,\u00a0said the panel will \u201creconvene and hear from the committees that worked to uncover the facts before us.\u201d Fox News is told the committee will invite the majority and minority sides to present their cases in a public forum.<\/p>\n<p>Intelligence Committee Democrats released their report Tuesday. Republicans published a \u201cpre-buttal\u201d response ahead of time, on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s impossible to judge if the panel may hold additional hearings with witnesses.\u00a0Nadler said if members determined there were \u201cimpeachable offenses, then we must move swiftly to do our duty and charge him accordingly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hearings and other public sessions may not be required in the impeachment process, but if Democrats intend to impeach the president on the floor, they first must craft actual articles of impeachment. <\/p>\n<p>The Judiciary Committee would write articles of impeachment in what\u2019s called a \u201cmarkup\u201d session. Markups aren\u2019t hearings. There are no witnesses. It\u2019s just all of the members of the committee, sitting on the dais, offering articles of impeachment, amendments to those proposals and debating the merits or demerits of various plans. For instance, the Judiciary Committee considered five articles of impeachment for then-President Richard Nixon in 1974, but the panel ultimately approved\u00a0only three. <\/p>\n<p>So, if the full House were to impeach the president this year, the time crunch is real. <\/p>\n<p>House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.,\u00a0announced earlier this week the body will stay in session until almost Christmas. Democrats emerging from their caucus meeting Wednesday morning told reporters they were advised to stick around Washington through Dec. 21 or 22. It should be noted that the House impeached then-President Bill Clinton on Dec. 19, 1998, in a rare Saturday session, just before Christmas. So, a Christmastime impeachment would be plausible.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/video.foxnews.com\/v\/6113044936001\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wordpressdynamos.com\/timesofnewscdn\/USA\/aeebf_694940094001_6113043306001_6113044936001-vs.jpg\" alt=\"Doug Collins presses Jerry Nadler over demand for Republican day of witnesses\" \/><span class=\"overlay\">Video<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>But, would Democrats have the votes for impeachment? Pelosi has been a master at reading her caucus. If Pelosi has the votes, she\u2019ll likely give the green light to impeach on the floor. If Pelosi doesn\u2019t have the votes, impeachment could wait \u2013 conceivably until the new year. Voting to impeach \u2013 or not impeach \u2013 could hinge on precisely what articles the Judiciary Committee were to draft.<\/p>\n<p>The key would be having the votes. There are currently 431 members of the House. It takes 216 to impeach. There are presently 233 Democrats. That means Democrats can afford to lose only 17 of their own and still impeach. Democrats could lose 18 if Rep. Justin Amash, I-Mich., voted to impeach. Such parliamentary algebra also would mean\u00a0a swath of the 31 Democrats representing districts that Trump carried in 2016 would have to vote to impeach.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/legal-scholars-clash-in-hearing-over-whether-trump-committed-impeachable-offense\"><strong>LEGAL SCHOLARS CLASH OVER WHETHER TRUMP COMMITTED IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In addition to the math, Democrats are facing another conundrum.<\/p>\n<p>Impeachment would consume an enormous amount of time on the House floor. The legislative freight demanded by impeachment is one of the most significant responsibilities facing the House. An impeachment debate can\u2019t run for just\u00a0an hour or two on the floor. <\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s what else the House may have to tackle in the coming days:<\/p>\n<p>Democrats have been trying to approve the annual defense bill, consuming floor time. The House and Senate have to figure out a way to fund the government before 11:59:59 p.m. ET on Dec. 20. Otherwise, there would be another holiday shutdown like last year. <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s possible the House and Senate could approve a handful of the annual 12 spending bills and then do an interim spending bill for the remainders. Or, lawmakers could weave together a clump of outstanding appropriations bills and fund the government that way. No matter the path, funding the government takes time.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/video.foxnews.com\/v\/6112989629001\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wordpressdynamos.com\/timesofnewscdn\/USA\/6df5b_694940094001_6112996198001_6112989629001-vs.jpg\" alt=\"Bret Baier says impeachment hearing becomes a ping-pong match between Democrats and Republicans\" \/><span class=\"overlay\">Video<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>And, here\u2019s the big issue: Analysts point out congressional Democrats\u00a0simply cannot allow a government shutdown this time and impeach the president. Otherwise, Trump and Republicans would proclaim that Democrats were too busy impeaching the president and not on conducting the most basic of congressional tasks: funding the government. Democrats have been aware of this quandary. So, in some ways, the impeachment of Trump in 2019 could hinge on whether there\u2019s an agreement on government spending. <\/p>\n<p>Also gravitating in the congressional ether: the new trade pact between the U.S., Mexico and Canada, known as the USMCA. If Democrats sprint ahead with the USMCA this month, which isn\u2019t likely, there\u2019s almost no way the House could tangle with impeachment on the floor. <\/p>\n<p>Democrats could face a messaging problem heading into the holidays. The floor traffic is vexing. That\u2019s why some senior Democratic sources have suggested impeachment could wait until the new year &#8212; although it\u2019s not a sure thing.<\/p>\n<p>One source close to Pelosi was skeptical of moving impeachment this month.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.onelink.me\/xLDS?pid=AppArticleLinkaf_dp=foxnewsaf%3A%2F%2Faf_web_dp=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fapps-products\"><strong>CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u201cI just don\u2019t see it,\u201d the Democratic source said about advancing impeachment before Christmas. \u201cIt\u2019s too big.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, a 2019 impeachment of the president could depend on bandwidth. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Video Constitutional experts clash in House Judiciary Committee hearing on impeachment Professor Jonathan Turley rebuts bribery, obstruction claims against President Trump; reaction and analysis from the &#8216;Special Report&#8217; All-Star panel. CAPITOL HILL \u2013 Is there enough time for lawmakers\u00a0to deposit articles of impeachment on the House floor this calendar year? Or, could this wait? Finally, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[84],"class_list":["post-195671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political","tag-political"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195671\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usa.timesofnews.com\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}