Share

AG William Barr says 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign; he will review whether it was lawful

WASHINGTON — Attorney General William Barr told a Senate panel Wednesday that he is reviewing whether federal authorities improperly spied on President Donald Trump’s campaign during the early stages of its investigation into whether any of his aides participated in Russian efforts to sway the 2016 election in his favor.

“Spying on a campaign is a big deal,” Barr told a Senate panel Wednesday. “I think spying did occur. The question is whether it was adequately predicated.”

The attorney general said he planned to examine the “genesis and the conduct” of the FBI’s investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, launched in the midst of the 2016 presidential run. The inquiry was ultimately turned over to special counsel Robert Mueller to complete, and Barr has said it concluded that Trump’s campaign did not conspire with the Russian government.

“I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr told the Senate Appropriations subcommittee. “I am concerned about it. There is a basis for my concern.” 

Barr, however, declined to say what specific concern prompted his review or to describe the parts of the investigation he considered to be spying. 

Earlier Wednesday, Trump characterized the Mueller investigation as both “illegal” and an “attempted coup,” while expressing support for a review by Barr.

“There is a hunger for this to happen,” Trump told reporters.    

The department’s inspector general is conducting a review of surveillance warrants authorities used to eavesdrop on a former campaign aide, Carter Page, in October 2016. Barr has said that effort should be completed by June. Republicans in Congress have complained repeatedly that the FBI targeted Trump’s campaign for political reasons, revealing text messages between two senior officials involved in the probe who expressed their personal contempt for Trump.

So far, however, investigations in Congress have not produced evidence that the extraordinary inquiry into whether Trump’s campaign cooperated with Russian efforts to sway the 2016 election that put him in office were politically motivated or meant to sabotage his campaign. 

Among the questions Barr said he will seek to answer is why the Trump campaign was not notified in advance by federal authorities of its examination of Russian election interference.

“I don’t understand why the campaign was not advised,” Barr said.

Building on his testimony a day earlier before a House committee, Barr told lawmakers Wednesday he planned to ask other Justice Department officials to examine whether the department abused its surveillance powers. He said he had not formed a view of whether the department or other intelligence agencies acted improperly, but the sensitivity of using national security tools to investigate the conduct of a political campaign required scrutiny.

Barr said that he did not view surveillance abuse as “a problem endemic to the FBI,” but suggested that there was likely “a failure among a group of leaders there.”

The questions came as Barr prepared to release a redacted version of Mueller’s final report on the Russia investigation “next week.”

Barr asserted that some parts of the report must remain secret because they contain grand jury information, sensitive national security material, may interfere with ongoing inquiries or contain information that could be damaging to the reputations of those who were not charged in the special counsel’s investigation.

CLOSE

Attorney General William Barr says he will release a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on the Russia investigation within a week. (April 9)
AP

The attorney general said Mueller and his staff were working to help remove sensitive information from the report so it could be released to Congress and the public. And he defended the summary conclusions he delivered to Congress last month and the speed with which those conclusions were made public.

But lawmakers closely questioned Barr on his decision to release a bare-bones summary of the report last month in which the attorney general said Mueller had not found a conspiracy involving the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

The special counsel did not make a determination about whether the president’s actions during the investigation amounted to obstruction. Instead, Barr and his deputy, Rod Rosenstein, separately determined that Trump’s conduct did not constitute a crime.

Barr told the Senate on Wednesday that Mueller did not indicate whether he expected Congress to settle the issue of obstruction. Mueller also did not indicate that the decision should be ceded to the attorney general, Barr said. The attorney general added that he and Rosenstein–along with other Justice officials–concluded independently that Trump’s conduct was not criminal.

“I don’t know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion,” Barr said.

The attorney general’s intervention at the end of Mueller’s investigation has set off a politically charged battle for access to the entire text of the special counsel’s report, the fruit of a 22-month investigation that has shadowed the Trump administration since its first days.

While Barr had been called before the Senate and House committees this week to discuss the Justice Department’s $29 billion budget, the focus of both hearings was trained on his handling of Mueller’s report and when the document would be made public.

On Tuesday, Barr told the House committee that he had no plans to ask for a court’s permission to disclose grand jury material but said he would consult with Congress after he releases the report to determine whether he can provide additional information. 

House Democrats vowed last week that they would seek Mueller’s testimony in addition to that of Barr, who also is expected to address the matter for congressional committees in early May.

Justice, however, has defended Barr’s handling of the report, suggesting that the full document was so packed with secret grand jury information that revealing even portions of it immediately would have been impossible.

Contributing: David Jackson

Post to Facebook

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

  • Jan 25, 2019; Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA; American political consultant Roger Stone speaks to the media after being arraigned on federal charges at U.S District Courthouse. Mandatory Credit: Jasen Vinlove-USA TODAY Sports ORG XMIT: USATSI-400975 ORIG FILE ID:  20190125_jfv_bv1_027.jpg1 of 9
  • WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 07: Former Trump Campaign aide George Papadopoulos leaves the U.S. District Court after his sentencing hearing on September 7, 2018 in Washington, DC. Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last year for making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement to investigators during FBI's probe of Russian interference during the 2016 presidential election.   (Photo by Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images) ***BESTPIX*** ORG XMIT: 775185310 ORIG FILE ID: 10287614882 of 9
  • (FILES) In this file photo taken on December 11, 2017 former Trump campaign official Rick Gates leaves Federal Court in Washington, DC.Gates testified on August 6, 2018 on day 5 of the trial against former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. Manafort, 69, is the first defendant to go to court to fight charges stemming from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. / AFP PHOTO / Brendan SmialowskiBRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images ORIG FILE ID: AFP_1865G73 of 9
  • epa06643143 Lawyer  Alex Van Der Zwaan walks into the DC Federal Courthouse before hearing his sentence for making false statements to federal investigators in Washington, DC, USA, 03 April 2018. Van Der Zwaan, the son-in-law of a Ukrainian-Russian oligarch, is a target in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in US presidential elections.  EPA-EFE/JIM LO SCALZO ORG XMIT: JJL014 of 9
  • Dec 12, 2018; New York, NY, USA; Michael Cohen departs after sentencing at the Moynahan Federal Courthouse. Mandatory Credit: Robert Deutsch-USA TODAY ORIG FILE ID:  20181212_sal_usa_1685.JPG5 of 9
  • W. Samuel Patten leaves the federal court in Washington, Friday, Aug. 31, 2018. Patten entered a guilty plea in federal court in Washington, shortly after prosecutors released a four-page charging document that accused him of performing lobbying and consulting work in the United States and Ukraine but failing to register as a foreign agent as required by the Justice Department. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) ORG XMIT: DCJL105 [Via MerlinFTP Drop]6 of 9
  • SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA - AUGUST 9:  (RUSSIA OUT)  Russian billionaire and businessman Yevgeniy Prigozhin attends Russian-Turkish talks in Konstantin Palace in Strenla on August,9, 2016 in  Saint Petersburg, Russia. President of Turkey is having a one-day visit to Putin's hometown. (Photo by Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images) ORG XMIT: 660445815 [Via MerlinFTP Drop]7 of 9
  • Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort departs the federal court house after a status hearing in Washington, DC, earlier this year.8 of 9
  • Former national security adviser Michael Flynn leaves after an appearance at U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.9 of 9

Article source: http://rssfeeds.usatoday.com/~/600685698/0/usatodaycomwashington-topstories~AG-William-Barr-says-aposspying-did-occurapos-on-Trump-campaign-he-will-review-whether-it-was-lawful/

Loading...

Best Wordpress Plugin development company in India     Best Web development company in India