Rachel Reeves, Britain’s top financial official, has spent the past few months imploring voters and markets with a consistent message: Trust me, I have the right plan for the economy.
There are signs that she has been able to convince some bond traders, Silicon Valley and other international investors. The problem is that her pitch has fallen on deaf ears at home.
In Britain, there was hope that her political party would “not just be a safe pair of hands but do things that were radically moving in the right direction,” said David Aikman, the director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, an independent think tank. “Relative to those expectations, people feel it hasn’t worked.”
Ms. Reeves’s position as chancellor of the Exchequer is deeply entwined with that of Keir Starmer, the prime minister. But their leadership of the governing Labour Party, and by extension the country, is under threat. After dire results in local and regional elections last month, many have called on Mr. Starmer to step aside. An election on Thursday could return Andy Burnham, who is vying to be the next leader of the Labour Party, to Parliament. If he wins, he could challenge Mr. Starmer for the top job.
Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/17/business/rachel-reeves-uk-debt.html