ChatGPT and its artificial intelligence kin may be one of the best things that’s happened to universities in a long time. That’s important to remember amid all the handwringing (I’ve done my share) in higher education circles over essay writing and academic rigor in light of this AI marvel.
ChatGPT in academics is a complex issue. It’s not your parents’ Google, and educational leaders should carefully consider the intersections between the age-old mission of teaching and learning and this new technology.
The first intersection is speed. Google made it possible to find an answer in a matter of keystrokes. ChatGPT further accelerates this by not merely finding an answer but also presenting that answer in a finished product.
If ChatGPT eliminates rote work, freeing academic minds to pursue new possibilities and apply their time and energy to solve novel problems, it could multiply academic potential and lead to more breakthroughs more quickly. In fields such as biomedical research, the result could be lifesaving.
However, speed could come at the cost of comprehensive understanding. Consider GPS. Enter two points into your phone and you won’t get lost. It’s easy and efficient. Relying on paper maps, personal familiarity and trial and error to get from one point to another is not. But the latter gives us a richer, more thorough understanding of our local geography and how streets, neighborhoods and cities all fit together. Siri doesn’t.
ChatGPT made up research claiming guns aren’t harmful to kids. How far will we let AI go?ChatGPT falsely accused me of sexually harassing my students
Another view:John Oliver is wrong to worry about ChatGPT. AI can help us solve complex problems.
The process of discovery helps build knowledge of what’s relevant and what’s not, how the pieces fit together, how one event leads to another and the countless interconnections.
Here’s what we get wrong about getting a good education.
A shooting happened next to my classroom:How do you teach after gun violence like that?
Finally, ChatGPT may help revitalize the importance of creativity in higher education. Sure, ChatGPT can write a good paper – but it can’t write a great one, because it can’t draw from human emotions or tell a personal story.
It can pull from every work ever created, but it can’t make something completely original. It can find an answer, but it can’t be the first to ask the question.
Progress requires iconoclasts, creatives and pioneers. It requires a willingness to take chances, be bold and risk failure. We must embrace creativity and humanity and not merely repeat and recycle curated information and ideas.
So, while ChatGPT is great at finding answers, how to best integrate this quantum technological leap into the mission of higher education is a question whose answer will require the sort of originality, boldness and flights of imagination that, at least for now, only humans possess.
Michael A. Fitts is president of Tulane University in New Orleans.