Pentagon again delays release of sex assault study, likening report to an untested weapon
WASHINGTON – The Pentagon is again delaying release of a report ranking the risk of sexual assault at more than 200 military installations, comparing the study to a unleashing an untested weapon system, according to interviews and documents obtained by USA TODAY.
The release of the study, now set for September, will likely spark concerns among troops and their families, particularly those stationed at bases where RAND Corp. research determines they face highest risk of suffering sexual assault.
The report’s rankings will be of particular interest to the tens of thousands of recruits who join the military each year and their families. It will raise questions about what choice, if any, they have in declining assignment to a post with a higher risk of assault, and what liability the military has for a recruit assaulted at such a base.
The Pentagon received an updated draft of the study on July 24, four days after USA TODAY reported that Defense Department officials were reluctant to release it. RAND stood by its findings. The only changes being made to it now are to communicate its conclusions better, according to Jeffrey Hiday, a RAND spokesman.
But a senior Pentagon official, in a letter to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., maintained that the report required “additional steps†by RAND to explain its “approach and conclusions,†wrote Stephanie Barna, the top personnel official at the Pentagon.
Barna wrote that the Pentagon has been working with RAND to “resolve questions about the study’s methods and outcomes.”
She went on to compare the report to an untested weapon system.
“Just as (the Department of Defense) would not field a weapon system without knowing its strengths, limitations, and functionality, we must be certain of the strengths, limitations and functionality of the new risk estimation analysis fielded in the RAND report,†Barna wrote.
RAND disputed the contention that its approach to the study was flawed.
“We’re confident we utilized the best scientific methodology to analyze the available data and stand behind both the soundness of our analysis and our findings,” Hiday said.
The RAND Corp. study was commissioned by the Pentagon in July 2016 to study risk of sexual assault. The aim has been to review data on sexual assault and harassment in 2014 to determine how they affect risk of assault at individual bases.
RAND agreed to create supplemental products to help clarify their results while maintaining the integrity of their original methods and results, Air Force Maj. Carla Gleason, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said Wednesday.
Those products include detailed findings for each installation, Hiday said.
“The revisions have not changed the estimates themselves or the statistical methods used to create them, nor has the feedback from (the Department of Defense)Â suggested any specific problems with regard to these methods,” Hiday said.
Barna told Gillibrand, who along with Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, has called for the release of the report, that the Pentagon is preparing for its release.
Commanders at bases with the highest risk of assault can be expected to face questions from troops, families and the media about problems at their facility and what’s being done to address them.
In its latest survey through September 2017, the Pentagon reported a 9.7% increase in reports of sexual assault among troops. There were 6,769 reports of sexual assault in fiscal year 2017 compared with 6,172 reports made in 2016.
More: Iranian Navy increases activity near key oil choke point, prompts warning from Pentagon
More: Generals and admirals caught in sex scandals could lose clearances under defense funding bill
More: Pentagon delays release of report that ranks bases by risk of sexual assault
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â